This page looks plain and unstyled because you're using a non-standard compliant browser. To see it in its best form, please upgrade to a browser that supports web standards. It's free and painless.
Jan Novak, Associate Director jan.novak@law.csuohio.edu | November 21, 2006 - 08:28
The
Ohio Supreme Court ruled on November 20 that Cleveland’s predatory lending
ordinances violated the home
rule provisions of the Ohio Constitution because they impose stronger
restrictions on lenders than those enacted by the Ohio General Assembly. Am. Financial Servs. Assn. v. Cleveland, __ Ohio St
3d __, 2006-Ohio-6043. Justice Terence O’Donnell wrote the majority opinion.
| « | November 2006 | » | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Su | Mo | Tu | We | Th | Fr | Sa |
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | |||
| 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 |
| 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 |
| 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 |
| 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | ||