This page looks plain and unstyled because you're using a non-standard compliant browser. To see it in its best form, please upgrade to a browser that supports web standards. It's free and painless.

CMLawLibraryBlog

The CM Law Library Blog seeks to inform the Cleveland-Marshall College of Law community about key legal education, research, practice, and law library news, with a particular focus on Cuyahoga County and Ohio as well as faculty research interests.

Employment Law Clinic Says "No" to Sale of Criminal Records in Bulk

Sue Altmeyer, Electronic Services Librarian, sue.altmeyer@law.csuohio.edu | January 17, 2008 - 14:36

Cleveland Marshall's Employment Law Clinic told the Ohio Supreme Court that a proposed rule allowing Ohio courts to sell records in bulk would have a negative impact on job-seekers whose records were expunged. The Clinic's comments were written by law student Thomas Fitzpatrick under the supervision of Clinical Professor Gordon J. Beggs. The comments state that a background check company that buys the court records may not update the records for later expungements. Bulk sales of records should be disallowed, said the Clinic, unless adequate safeguards can be made to ensure that background check companies keep up-to-date records.

See our prior post: Groups Weigh In on Proposed Ohio Court Record Privacy Rules


International Year of Languages (and potatoes)

Amy Burchfield, Access & Faculty Services Librarian amy.burchfield@law.csuohio.edu | January 17, 2008 - 08:48

The General Assembly of the United Nations has declared 2008 to be the International Year of Languages (it’s also declared 2008 the International Year of the Potato!!).

Linguist rights have long been included in the many basic human rights; especially protected are the linguistic rights of minorities. EISIL (Electronic Information System for International Law) has collected a handy page of primary documents, web sites and research resources on linguistic rights, which includes links to the 1996 Universal Declaration of Linguistic Rights and the 1992 European Charter for Regional or Minority Languages.

The United States has likewise confronted the issue of linguistic rights, as exemplified by the 1923 U.S. Supreme Court case of Meyer v. Nebraska 262 U.S. 390. The plaintiff had been convicted under a Nebraska statute of unlawfully teaching the subject of reading in the German language to a ten year old student. The Court overturned the law, declaring it unconstitutional under the Due Process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment [Library of Congress web guide].


 
Accessible and Valid XHTML 1.0 Strict and CSS
Powered by pLog - Design by BalearWeb