This page looks plain and unstyled because you're using a non-standard compliant browser. To see it in its best form, please upgrade to a browser that supports web standards. It's free and painless.
Jan Novak, Associate Director jan.novak@law.csuohio.edu | December 19, 2006 - 10:24
Earlham College Philosophy
Professor Peter Suber, one of the most respected leaders of the Open Access
movement, wishes to post this comment on yesterday’s blog entry, to make clear
the critical difference between self-publishing and self-archiving:
Depositing work in an open-access repository should be
called self-archiving, not self-publishing. It's not at all like vanity publishing
with the stigma washed off. Self-archiving is about providing open access
to peer-reviewed research, not about bypassing peer review. The vast
majority of self-archived articles are preprints, which are stages on the way
to peer-reviewed publication, or postprints, which have already been published
in peer-reviewed journals.
| « | December 2006 | » | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Su | Mo | Tu | We | Th | Fr | Sa |
| 1 | 2 | |||||
| 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 |
| 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 |
| 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 |
| 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 |
| 31 | ||||||