This page looks plain and unstyled because you're using a non-standard compliant browser. To see it in its best form, please upgrade to a browser that supports web standards. It's free and painless.
Jan Novak, Associate Director jan.novak@law.csuohio.edu | May 08, 2008 - 09:42
Many law
schools impose a mandatory lap top requirement; at Cleveland Marshall, over 90%
of the students have their own laptop computers as it is. But there is also a backlash from faculty
in some places claiming that laptop use in the classroom interferes with teaching and
learning. We reported earlier
about the University of Chicago Law School banning internet access in the
classroom. Now Kevin Yamamoto has published “Banning
Laptops in the Classroom: Is it Worth the Hassles?” (Journal of Legal Education, Vol. 57, 2008
Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1078740
), recounting his experience banning laptops in his classroom and citing studies on
the effect of classroom web browsing on student grades, as well as the
effectiveness of typing over handwriting for note-taking. Yamamoto
concludes that professors should ban or restrict laptops absent a showing that their
use increases learning.
| « | May 2008 | » | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Su | Mo | Tu | We | Th | Fr | Sa |
| 1 | 2 | 3 | ||||
| 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 |
| 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 |
| 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 |
| 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 |