This page looks plain and unstyled because you're using a non-standard compliant browser. To see it in its best form, please upgrade to a browser that supports web standards. It's free and painless.
Jessica Mathewson-Library Media Technical Asst.-jessica.mathewson@law.csuohio.edu | March 25, 2008 - 08:43
Chuck Northcutt | 25/03/2008, 13:54
| « | March 2008 | » | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Su | Mo | Tu | We | Th | Fr | Sa |
| 1 | ||||||
| 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 |
| 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 |
| 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 |
| 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 |
| 30 | 31 | |||||
As a Sirius man (and devout Howard Stern fan) I'm still on the fence about this. My original reaction was chilled, but there is a good argument with HD radio and iPod, the combined satellite radio service will have real competition; plus there is always free terrestrial radio (yuck!). Not to mention, that unlike oil, as a consumer, I DON'T NEED my Sirius, and can function just find without it, if they start outrageously rising prices. That said, I still don't see the reason for the big push from Sirius for this deal. Sirius has superior programming and there is not one channel or show on XM that is not already offered on Sirius or that I would want if it wasn't. In other words, Sirius was already on their way to burying XM...