This page looks plain and unstyled because you're using a non-standard compliant browser. To see it in its best form, please upgrade to a browser that supports web standards. It's free and painless.
Sue Altmeyer, Electronic Services Librarian, sue.altmeyer@law.csuohio.edu | April 18, 2008 - 11:30
Wednesday, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that Kentucky's lethal injection method does not violate the 8th Amendment. Baze v. Rees, No. 07-5439 (Apr. 16, 2008). Ohio's lethal injection method is similar to Kentucky's. The Baze decision may resolve a federal lawsuit filed by Ohio death row inmates, claiming that Ohio's lethal injection method is unconstitutional. There is also a Lorain County case pending where the trial judge is determining whether the lethal injection process amounts to cruel and unusual punishment. Death penalty opponents argue that Baze does not address mistakes in the injection process that have prolonged executions. See Reginald Fields, Ohioans React to Lethal Injection Ruling , The Plain Dealer, Apr. 17, 2008, Alan Johnson, Lethal Injection Gets Go-Ahead Columbus Dispatch, Apr. 17, 2008. Reginald Fields, Supreme Court upholds Kentucky's Lethal Injection Process; Clears Way for Ohio to Move Forward with Executions.,Openers Political Blog.
For more information on the federal suit challenging Ohio's death penalty, see More Inmates Challenge Lethal Injection, Cleveland Law Library Blog.
See our prior post: Ohio Death Penalty News
Adjunct Professor Alan Rossman will speak about the case on Tuesday April 22, from noon to one, LB 202. The lunch presentation is open to the first 30 C-M students/faculty/staff who RSVP to Jason Grimes by Monday.
| « | April 2008 | » | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Su | Mo | Tu | We | Th | Fr | Sa |
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
| 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 |
| 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 |
| 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | |||