« |
»
“False Light” Invasion of Privacy Now Recognized in Ohio
Sue Altmeyer, Electronic Services Librarian, sue.altmeyer@law.csuohio.edu | June 08, 2007 - 11:40
The Ohio Supreme Court held that “false light” invasion of
privacy is now a cause of action in Ohio. Welling
v. Weinfeld , 113 Ohio
St.3d 464, 2007-Ohio-2451. Ohio courts previously
did not recognize a false light cause of action. False light is one of the four categories of invasion of privacy claims identified in the Restatement
of Torts 2nd, Section 652A.
The elements of a false light claims are set out in Restatement of Torts
2nd, Section 652E. The
elements of the claim are:
- The
actor publicizes a matter concerning another.
- The
publicity puts the other person in a false light before the public.
- The
false light is highly offensive to a reasonable person.
- The
actor had knowledge of or acted in reckless disregard to the falsity of
the publicized matter, and the false light in which the other would be
placed.
The Welling decision
discusses two recent cases from other states, one which rejected a cause of
action for false light, and one which allowed the cause of action. The court also distinguishes
between defamation and false light invasion of privacy. The court points out situations where a
defamation action would fail, but there would be a cause of action for false
light. Welling also found that there are adequate First Amendment
protections for false light defendants.
The court noted that a false light tort is needed in the
Internet age, because anyone can make a matter known to the public.
Also see Court
Recognizes "False Light" Invasion of Privacy, Ohio Supreme Court
Opinion Summaries: